THE CHALLENGE

The client was paying for speed, but deductions were slowing the cash cycle.

The client was paying for faster payment terms, but shortage claims and deduction activity were reducing the practical value of the agreement.

Although the account had a 30-day target, the real cash collection cycle was much longer. This created a gap between the commercial agreement and the actual financial outcome.

Without clear payment-time analysis, leadership could not easily see whether Quick Pay was improving cash flow or simply becoming another cost within the Amazon Vendor relationship.

WHAT BLUEDOT DID

BlueDot turned payment timing into a measurable cash-flow issue.

We analysed weighted average payment time by month and compared actual performance against the 30-day Quick Pay target.

The work focused on showing the gap between agreed terms and actual payment behaviour, highlighting where payment delays, deductions and shortage claims were affecting cash flow.

This gave the client a clearer basis to challenge the value of the Quick Pay agreement, review shortage-claim impact and improve payment visibility across finance and operations.

THE RESULT

A CFO-level view of the real value behind Quick Pay.

The 30-day payment term could not be evaluated in isolation. Although payments followed the agreed terms, shortage claims and deductions reduced the effective cash-flow benefit.

The analysis gave leadership a clear financial basis to assess whether Quick Pay was creating net value, being diluted by recoverable leakage, or requiring stronger controls before continuing as a commercial cost.

30 daysPayment terms agreed

80+ days Weighted average payment days

133 days Peak payment delay identified

At a glance
Client type
Amazon Vendor
Sector
Video Games and Consoles
Region
USA
Engagement
Testing whether Quick Pay was delivering real cash-flow benefit.
Headline result
90-day payment terms were available for free, while the client was paying an additional 2% and still averaging above 80 days PO-to-cash.

The client was paying for faster payment, but the data showed the account was still operating on an extended cash cycle.

Case Studies

More case studies

Finance recovery

Unlocking Visibility Across Amazon Vendor Payments and Deductions

BlueDot reviewed the client’s Amazon Vendor value flow from purchase order request through to accepted value, payments and deductions. The analysis identified a significant gap between requested and accepted PO value, over $4M in deductions, and recoverable leakage linked to shortage claims and under invoiced quantities.

$4.53M Total deductions identified

$3.24M Recovery priority identified

$37.2M Acceptance value gap exposed

Read the full case study

Ready to take control of your Vendor Central operation?

Book a 30-minute introductory call.
No obligation, no pitch, just a practical conversation about your operation.

Book a Call